Ralph Nader, an honest man
Congressman refuses to probe
terrorist cell in his district
Florida green card immigration
bribery and evidence shredding cover-up reaches into
House of Representatives
http://tomflocco.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=106&mode=&order=0&thold=0
ORLANDO--January 28, 2005--TomFlocco.com--Despite widespread
news reports linking Moroccan Muslims to worldwide terrorism,
Florida Congressman Ric Keller (R-8-FL) has declined
to call for a formal FBI or Government Accounting Office
(GAO) investigation of Orlando Homeland Security official
Mary Schneider's concrete evidence of green card bribery
of immigration officials by illegal Moroccan Muslims
linked to a terrorist cell in Keller's central Florida
congressional district--the hub of Sunshine State tourism
and airline traffic.
Our interview with the Orlando immigration adjudication
officer revealed that Keller, who is a member of the
House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland
Security told Mary Schneider "your problem is not
a matter within the purview of a federal agency."
READ
MORE
Advice from Charles Schlund on Ralph Nader
From: Charles Schlund <xfiles@uswest.net>
Sent: Nov 17, 2004 9:14 AM
In my current lawsuit against George W. Bush which
still sites before the federal court I list about 30
names of CIA operatives and about 30 names of people
that the CIA, Army, OSS, DEA, or other government agencies
have assassinated.
The information is correct and truthful. Ralph Nader
is still a CIA operative and was in the elections to
fix the elections in favor of Bush. Also Ralph Nader
ran his organizations to attack competing corporations
while protecting the secret government corporations.
In the CIA files I had were the orders to Ralph Nader
for the break up of AT&T to prepare it for what we have
today. In the old days AT&T could not buy advertising
like the new companies do because there was no one to
advertise against. The break up allowed the hiding of
the 100's of billions of dollar in profits and allowed
the financing of TV stations, radio stations, newspapers,
magazines, and others through advertising. This allowed
the CIA to tax the people in their phone bills for these
funds that were needed to finance these operations.
It was kind of a secret tax.
When I had the Don Bolles files in 1977 a large file
on GM was in the documents including the orders to Ralph
Nader for the lawsuit against Corvair. GM did not want
to produce the Corvair any longer because it gave people
ideas that there were alternatives to the kinds of cars
they were going to produce. GM 'the Rockefeller family'
wanted all the cars the same with just the metal bent
differently. GM could not remove such a popular car
from sales so they had Ralph Nader do it for them. Everything
was a stage show and nothing was real.
TO AMERICAN VOTERS: These several portions of Charles
Schlund's lawsuit pertain directly to either Ralph Nader
or others who have, or will possibly, run for president
of the United States of America in the future. To read
all of the file from which this information came, click
on the icon on this Web site which says Recommended
Reading and look for Charles Schlund's Lawsuit. Thank
you.
27. Further, Claimant Schlund alleges the following
is a very short list of the files or names of some of
the CIA or other agents involved in the overthrow of
America. Some belonged to different groups or organizations
that the CIA ran like the Aryan Brotherhood, Crypts,
Bloods, Dirty Dozen, Masons, Italian Mob, Jewish Mob,
Irish Mob, Mexican Mob and many other secret societies,
drug cartels, political action committees, and many
other kinds of organizations.
|
1. Nelson Rockefeller |
16. Spiro T. Agnew |
|
2. David Rockefeller |
17. Gerald R. Ford |
|
3. Ronald Reagan |
18. Ted Koppel |
|
4. Charlton Heston |
19. G. Gordon Liddy |
|
5. Ralph Nader |
20. John Poindexter |
|
6. Pat Robertson |
21. Colin Powell |
|
7. Pat Buchanan |
22. Edwin Meese |
|
8. Jerry Falwell |
23. Henry Fonda |
|
9. Malcolm Forbes |
24. Jane Fonda |
|
10. Bruce Babbitt |
25. Abigail Van Buren |
|
11. Ross Perot |
26. Amanda Blake |
|
12. Dr. Robert Schuller |
27. Bob Dole |
|
13. Dick Cheney |
28. Joe Arpaio |
|
14. Dan Quayle |
29. Phillip Jordan |
|
15. Richard Nixon |
30. Lyndon Johnson |
34. Claimant Schlund alleges the CIA runs candidates
for third and fourth political parties to split the
vote as needed to assure that their candidates are elected.
35. Further, Claimant Schlund alleges the CIA would
use their TV stations, radio stations, newspapers, and
magazines to attack any opposing candidates and to support
their candidates. Claimant alleges they had all the
CIA files on all the TV stations, radio stations, newspapers,
magazines, and other organizations that they covertly
owned, influenced, or controlled.
46. Some of the following information is how the Rockefeller
family, Bush family and the CIA, DEA, and others planned
on ensuring they would win in all future presidential
elections.
47. George Bush Sr. and the CIA under the directions
of Nelson and David Rockefeller had planned on using
third and fourth parties to split the vote when it became
necessary to do so to win the presidential elections
of the United States. Starting in 1992, Claimant Schlund
briefed the FBI on the CIA files of the people that
would run these political parties for the CIA. Claimant
Schlund briefed the FBI that he had read Ross Perot's
CIA file and that Ross Perot worked for the Bush family
and the CIA and was in the presidential election to
split the vote. Claimant Schlund believes he stopped
this and caused Ross Perot to drop out of the race by
hand delivering a letter to the FBI in New Orleans,
Louisiana. Claimant Schlund believes that the letter
was dated June 24, 1992. Soon after, Ross Perot dropped
out of the presidential race. Claimant Schlund believes
that Ross Perot's paranoia then prevented him from fulfilling
his job of splitting the vote and fixing the presidential
election of the United States. This resulted in the
people electing William Clinton to the presidency of
the United States.
48. Claimant Schlund in 1992 briefed the FBI on Ralph
Nader's CIA file and how Ralph Nader worked for the
CIA and had broken up AT&T for the CIA. In the CIA files
Claimant had AT&T was a publicly owned corporation controlled
by the Rockefeller family and the CIA. The break-up
of AT&T was done to hide the profits and to create new
corporations that could advertise against each other
to fund the CIA's and Rockefeller families TV stations,
radio stations, magazines, newspapers, and other media
businesses and corporations. Ralph Nader also runs the
Consumer Advocacy and Information Group which was used
to protect the Rockefeller empire while attacking competing
unprotected corporations.
49. Claimant Schlund, in 1992, briefed the FBI that
he also read the CIA file on Pat Buchanan and that he
also worked for the CIA, Rockefeller and Bush families.
50. In 1992, Claimant Schlund briefed the FBI on Ronald
Reagan's CIA file and how he had been selected to be
the actor to play the part of the President of the United
States of America for the Director of the CIA George
Bush, in the systematic overthrow of the United States
by the CIA. Claimant Schlund also briefed the FBI on
how Ronald Reagan had ran California for the CIA as
governor and how he had worked for the Office of Special
Services ("OSS") and later the CIA throughout his life.
Ronald Reagan was an FBI informant for the CIA so he
could feed the FBI incorrect information along with
real information that the FBI would know was true. The
CIA always does it this way to make their operatives
believable when they are really only supplying false
unverifiable facts to covertly miss direct those that
could be a threat to them.
51. In 1992, Claimant Schlund alleges he briefed the
FBI on Bruce Babbit's CIA file. This included how Babbitt
worked for George Bush, Sr. and the CIA and had run
the drug cartel known as the Dirty Dozen for George
Bush, Sr. This included information on when he was Attorney
General of Arizona and Governor of Arizona for the CIA.
Claimant Schlund strongly protested his appointment
by President Clinton to the FBI.
55. In 1992, Claimant Schlund briefed the FBI on Pat
Robertson's CIA file. Pat Robertson and his TV programming
and news were designed and planned by the CIA and were
in part funded with drug proceeds and other stolen or
misappropriated moneys. I briefed the FBI on how Pat
Robertson liked the girls too much in his CIA file.
George Bush, Sr. believed that this could damage his
credibility as a TV evangelist so George Bush, Sr. had
the CIA make some new pills to look like the pills Pat
Robertson took each morning. These new pills would curtail
his sex life during the day and would wear off by night
so Pat Robertson could have a normal sex life after
work but no sex during work. Pat Robertson covertly
told Christians who God's presidential candidate was
which was used to influence the presidential elections
of the United States. These acts by the CIA amounted
to treason.
56. In 1992 I briefed the FBI on Jerry Farewell's
CIA file. He also worked for the CIA and his ministry
was not really what it appeared to be. He was not moral
or the majority. Later the IRS went after his tax exempt
status because he was really just CIA and the Christian
Coalition was really just to control voters and others
to direct future public elections and political objectives.
Then the Congress went after the IRS to stop the IRS
from interfering in George Bush Sr.'s. plans for the
overthrow of the United States by the CIA.
END
AS PUBLISHER OF THE JOURNAL OF HISTORY (La verdad sobre
la democracia), I FORMALLY ENDORSE DR. RON PAUL, M.D.
FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN 2008.
CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL IS TRUTHFUL U.S. Congressman Ron
Paul, M.D. House of Representatives 203 Cannon Office
Building Washington D.C. 20515 The other day, I made
a huge "gaffe" on national TV: I told the truth about
the crimes of the U.S. Government. As you can imagine,
the ceiling fell in, and a couple of walls too. Congressmen
are supposed to support the government, I was told.
Oh, it's okay to criticize around edges, but there are
certain subjects a member of the House of Representatives
is not supposed to bring up. But I touched the real
"third rail" of American politics, and the sparks sure
flew. I was interviewed on C-SPAN's morning "Washington
Journal," and I used the opportunity, as I do all such
media appearances, to point out how many of our liberties
have been stolen by the federal government. We must
take them back. The Constitution, after all, has a very
limited role for Washington, D.C. If we stuck to the
Constitution as written, we would have: no federal meddling
in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U. S. membership
in the U.N.; no gun control; and no foreign aid. We
would have no welfare for big corporations, or the "poor,"
No American troops in 100 foreign countries; no NAFTA,
GATT, or "fast-track," no arrogant federal judges usurping
states rights; no attacks on private property; and no
income tax. We can get rid of most of the cabinet departments,
most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government
would be small, frugal, and limited. That system is
called Liberty. It's what the Founding Fathers gave
us. Under liberty, we built the greatest, freest, most
prosperous, most decent country on earth. It's no coincidence
that the monstrous growth of the federal government
has been accompanied by a sickening decline in living
standards and moral standards. The feds want us to be
hamsters on a tread mill working hard, all day long,
to pay high taxes, but otherwise entirely docile and
controlled. The huge, expensive, and out-of control
leviathan that we call the federal government wants
to run every single aspect of our lives. Well, I'm sorry,
but that's not America. It's not what the Founders gave
us. It's not the country you believe in. It's not the
country I believe in. So, on that TV interview, I emphasized
not only the attacks on our property, but also the decline
of our civil liberties, at the hands of the federal
police. There's not supposed to be any federal police,
according to the Constitution. Then I really went over
the line. I talked about the Waco massacre. Bill Clinton
and Janet Reno claimed those 81 church members including
19 children, burned down their own Church, killed themselves,
and good riddance. So they put a few survivors on trial,
and threw them in prison for 40 years. We're not supposed
to remember that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and
Firearms--talk about an unconstitutional agency--rather
than arrest David Koresh on his regular morning jog,
called in the TV stations for a big publicity bonanza,
and sent a swat team in black masks and black uniforms
to break down his front door, guns blazing. They also
sent in a helicopter gun ship, to shoot the roof of
a church full of innocents. The Branch Davidians resisted,
and after a heartless siege of almost two months, and
after cutting off food, water, electricity, and playing
horrible rock and roll through huge speakers 24 hours
a day, the Feds sent in tanks to crush the walls of
the church, and inject poisonous CS gas. Now, CS gas
is banned under the Paris Convention on Chemical Warfare.
The U.S. could not use it in war. But it could and did
use it against American civilians. After the tanks did
their work on the church, the place burst into flames,
and all 81 people--men, women, children, and babies--were
incinerated in a screaming horror. Did some feds set
the fire? Did the flammable CS gas ignite, since without
electricity, the parishioners were using lanterns? Did
a tank knock over a lantern, striking one of the bales
of hay being used against the thin, walls as a defense
against bullets? Or did the Davidians, as Clinton and
Reno claim, kill themselves? A new documentary- -Waco:
Rules of Engagement--may show, throughout FLIR infrared
photography, FBI snipers killing the Davidians by shooting
through the back of the church, where no media cameras
were allowed. This film won a prize at the Sundance
Film Festival. It was made by people who took government's
side, until they investigated. Whatever the truth, there's
no question that an irresponsible federal government
has innocent blood on its hands, and not only from Waco.
And the refusal of corrupt perverse liberals to admit
it means nothing. It my interview, in answer to a caller's
question, I pointed out that Waco, in the federal murders
at Ruby Ridge'--especially the FBI snipers shot that
blast apart the head of the young mother holding her
baby caused many Americans to live in fear of federal
power. Then uttered the sentiment that caused the media
hysteria: I said that a lot of Americans fear that they
too might be attacked by federal swat teams for exercising
their constitutional rights, or merely for wanting to
be left alone. Whoa! You've never seen anything like
it. For days, in an all-out assault, I was attacked
by Democrats, unions, big business, establishment Republicans,
and of course the media, in Washington in my home state
of Texas. Newspapers foamed at the mouth, calling me
a "right-wing extremist". (Isn't that what King George
III called Thomas Jefferson?) I was even blamed for
the Oklahoma City bombing! And by the way, I don't believe
we've gotten the full truth on that either. All my many
opponents were outraged that a congressman would criticize
big government. "If you don't like Washington, resign!"
said a typical big-city newspaper editorial. But the
media, as usual, were all wet. (Do they ever get anything
right?) The average Congressman may go to Washington
to wallow in power, and line his pockets with a big
lobbying job for a special interest (so he can just
keep ripping-off the taxpayers). But that's not why
I'm in Congress. It's not why I left my medical practice
as a physician. It's not why I put up with all of the
abuse. It's not why I refuse a plush Congressional pension.
I'm in this fight for a reason. I want to hand on to
my children and grandchildren, and to you in your family,
a great and free America, an America true to her Constitution,
an America worthy of her history. I'll not let the crooks
and clowns and criminals have their way. I'm in Congress
to represent the ideas of Liberty, the ideas that you
and I share, for the people of my district, for the
people of Texas, for the people of America. That's why
I'm working to stop federal abuses, and to cut the government:
its taxes, its bureaucrats, its paramilitary police,
its spending, its meddling overseas, and every single
unconstitutional action it takes. And not with a pair
of nail scissors, but with a hammer and chisel. Won't
you help me do this work? Not much of the federal leviathan
would be left, if I had my way. But you'd be able to
keep the money you earn, your privacy would be secure,
your dollar would be sound, your local school would
be tops, and your kids wouldn't be sent off to some
useless or vicious foreign war to fight for the United
Nations. But Jefferson and the other Founders would
recognize our government, and our descendants would
bless us. By the way, when I say cut taxes, I don't
mean fiddle with the code. I mean abolish the income
tax and the IRS, and .. Recently, I asked a famous Republican
Committee Chairman--who's always talking about getting
rid of the IRS--why he engineered a secret $580 million
raise for the tax collectors. "They need it for their
computers," this guy told me. So the IRS can't extract
enough from us as it is! The National Taxpayers Unions
says I have the highest pro-taxpayer rating in Congressional
history, that I am the top "Taxpayer's Best Friend".
You know I won't play the Capitol Hill games with the
Capitol Hill gang, denouncing the IRS while giving the
Gestapo more of your money. Or figuring out some other
federal tax for them to squeeze out of you. I also want
to abolish the Federal Reserve Bank. The value of our
dollar and the level of our interest rates are not supposed
to be manipulated by a few members of the power elite
meeting secretly in a marble palace. The Federal Reserve
is unconstitutional, pure and simple. The only constitutional
money is gold and silver, not notes redeemable in them.
Not fed funny money. Without the Federal Reserve, our
money could not be inflated at the behest of big government
or big banks. Your income in savings would not lose
their value. Just as important, we wouldn't have this
endless string of booms and busts, recessions and depressions,
with each bust getting worse. They aren't natural to
the free market; they're caused by the schemers at the
Fed. President Andrew Jackson called the 19th century's
Fed " The Monster" because it was a vehicle for inflation
and all sorts of special-interest corruption. Let me
tell you, things haven't changed a bit. I also work
to save our schools from D.C. interference. Thanks to
the feds, new curriculums not only smear the Founders
as "racist, slave owning elitists," they seek to dumb
down all our students so they will all be equal. "Look-say"
reading and the abolition of phonics has the same purpose,
and so does the new "fuzzy" math, in which there are
no right and no wrong answers. That must be what they
use in the U.S. Treasury! It's certainly what they use
in the U.S. Congress. But ever since the beginning of
federal aid to education and accelerating with the establishment
of the rotten Department of Education, SAT scores have
been dropping. Schools, with few exceptions, are getting
worse every year. To save our kids, we must get the
sticky fingers of the feds off our local schools, and
let parents rule. That's what the Constitution says,
and the Bible too. And then there's my least favorite
topic, the U.N. World government is obviously unconstitutional.
It undermines our country sovereignty in the worst way
possible. That's why I want us out of the U.N., and
the U.N. itself taking a hike. After all, the U.N. is
socialist and corrupt (many votes can be bought with
a "blond and a case of Scotch" one U.N. ambassador once
said). It costs many billions, and it puts our soldiers
in U.N. uniforms under foreign commanders, and sends
them off to unconstitutional, undeclared wars. When
Michael New, one of the finest young men I've ever met,
objected to wearing U.N. blue, he was kicked out of
the American Army. What an outrage! Not one dime for
the U.N., and not one American soldier! Not Haiti, not
in Bosnia, not in Somalia, not in Rwanda. I know it's
radical, but how about devoting American military efforts
to defending America, and only America? Such ideas,
said one newspaper reporter, make me a maverick, who
will never go far because he won't go along to get along.
Darn right! What does "go far" mean? Get a big government
job? To heck with that. And I won't sell my vote for
pork either. When I walked through the U.S. Capitol
this morning, I got angry! . The building is filled
with statues and paintings of Jefferson, Madison, and
the other Founders. Those great men sacrificed everything
to give us a free country, and a Constitution to keep
it that way. When I was first elected, I placed my hand
on the Bible and swore an oath to uphold the Constitution.
That's exactly what I'm fighting for. Such ideas drive
the liberals crazy. Join this fight for the Constitution,
and stop those who want to rip it up, and throw it in
the Potomac. Together, we can join the Founders fight.
Together we can make this history. Sincerely, Ron Paul
U.S. Congressman 203 Canon, Washington D.C. 20515
Congressional Second Amendment Leader Under Massive
Attack
Gun Owners of America Political Victory Fund E-Mail
Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org
Tuesday, October 19, 2004
Rep. Marilyn Musgrave has more than lived up to expectations
during her first term in Congress. She worked with Rep.
Virgil Goode (R-VA) to found the Second Amendment Caucus
in the U.S. House. It has a membership that includes
the most aggressive pro-gun members of the House.
Under Rep. Musgrave's leadership, the Caucus organized
a presentation by Dr. John Lott and Dr. Bob Cottrell
to inform congressional offices about the truth of the
ban on semi-autos. It was very effective and was very
helpful for many of the staff who needed "ammunition"
and talking points in opposition to the ban.
Musgrave continued in the U.S. House what she often
did in the Colorado legislature -- she stood up to the
leadership of her own party. In Congress these confrontations
have included resisting tax increases and the further
socializing of the American medical system.
Gun owners need to have Marilyn Musgrave back in Congress
so that we can go on the offensive here in Washington
on the gun issue. Musgrave is poised to lead this effort
in 2005, but first she must win her second term.
A liberal group has launched an ad campaign with an
estimated budget of well over $1,000,000 aimed at defeating
Musgrave and replacing her with a former state senator
who supports gun control.
One of the ads shows an actress (who looks very much
like Musgrave) stealing a wristwatch from a corpse in
a coffin. In another ad, the Musgrave look-alike is
shown stealing from a soldier's burning house while
he is fighting in Iraq. Outrageous, yes. But remember
the philosophy of Hitler's chief propagandist: tell
a big enough lie often enough and it will be believed.
Musgrave has graduated to the big leagues, and it costs
plenty to play in the majors. I am asking you to join
with me in personally contributing to the reelection
campaign of this courageous champion of the Second Amendment.
Her defeat would send a very loud and negative message
to the majority of wobbly members of Congress. Namely,
it's O.K. to talk pro-gun, but don't do anything about
it or the liberal big money groups will pile on and
defeat you. And, don't do anything to ruffle the feathers
of the leadership of your own party.
We cannot allow that to happen. Please contribute online
to Musgrave's campaign right now at http://www.musgrave2004.com
-- the election is now just a few days away.
If you prefer, you can send a check by mailing the form
below -- but please, do it right away. Musgrave simply
must be able to match the huge flood of money that her
opponents are dumping into her campaign.
Sincerely,
Larry Pratt
Executive Director
******************** Clip-and-Mail Reply Memo ******************
To:
Marilyn Musgrave
Marilyn Musgrave for Congress
5401 Stone Creek Circle, Suite 777
Loveland, CO 80538
From: Title/Name ________________________________________________
Address__________________________________________________________
State/Zip________________________________________________________
Phone # _________________________________________________________
Fax #____________________________________________________________
Email____________________________________________________________
___ Yes, I want to contribute to your campaign. Enclosed
is my check made out to "Marilyn Musgrave for Congress"
in the amount
of: ___$25, ___$50, ___$100, Other $________.
___ Please charge the above amount to my credit card:
Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover
Card Name & #__________________________________________________
Expires___________
___ Yes, I would like to volunteer. Please have the
campaign contact me.
****************************
Solely paid for by Larry Pratt, 8001 Forbes Place, Springfield,
VA 22151. Not paid for or authorized by any candidate
or political party.
****************************
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the Rocky Mountain Gun Owner's
E-mail Alert Network.
Direct any replies, comments, or concerns to exdir@rmgo.org
To unsubscribe from this network, send an e-mail to
majordomo@lists.kci.net
with the following text body: Unsubscribe RMGO
To subscribe to this free list, send an e-mail to majordomo@lists.kci.net
with the following text body: Subscribe RMGO
Arlene's note: We know that Ralph Nader is good when
such entities chastise him because these entities are
propaganda machines. Here's what the Washington Post
has to say about this situation:
NADER AND ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE [ADL] 'LOCK HORNS'
The Washington Post, August 12th, 2004:
Ralph Nader, that master of controversy, has a new
bete noire: the Anti-Defamation League. The independent
presidential candidate has become embroiled in an ugly
exchange with the Jewish organization, after he suggested
that President Bush and Congress were "puppets" of the
Israeli government.
"The days when the chief Israeli puppeteer comes to
the United States and meets with the puppet in the White
House and then proceeds to Capitol Hill, where he meets
with hundreds of other puppets, should be replaced,"
Nader said earlier this summer.
That prompted an angry letter from the league, which
complained that the "image of the Jewish state as a
'puppeteer,' controlling the powerful US Congress feeds
into many age-old stereotypes which have no place in
legitimate public discourse."
Nader is not backing down. In a letter to the group
that will be released today, he reiterated his arguments,
challenged the league to cite a recent example of when
American leaders have pursued a policy opposed by the
Israeli government and pointed to Israeli peace groups
that he said share his criticism of that country's leadership.
"There is far more freedom in the media, in town squares
and among citizens, soldiers, elected representatives
and academicians in Israel to debate and discuss the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict than there is in the United
States," Nader wrote.
The long-time consumer advocate's willingness to criticize
Israel may win him some votes, since both Bush and Democratic
nominee John F. Kerry strongly support Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon. But not if Abraham H. Foxman,
the national director of the league has anything to
say about it. "What he said smacks of bigotry," Foxman
said.
John Kerry is David Rockefeller's choice for president.
So the rebutal in
the following expose is invalid in my humble opinion.
VETS CHARGE: KERRY KILLED FLEEING TEEN; LIED FOR MEDAL
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU AUG 04, 2004 10:14:25
ET XXXXX
http://www.drudgereport.com/dnc82.htm
VETS CHARGE: KERRY KILLED FLEEING TEEN; LIED FOR MEDAL
Slaughters Animals, Burns Down Tiny Village
**Exclusive**
A veterans group seeking to deeply discredit Democrat
John Kerry's military service will charge in the new
bombshell book UNFIT FOR COMMAND: http://tinyurl.com/5u3q8
"Kerry earned his Silver Star by killing a lone,
fleeing, teenage Viet Cong in a loincloth."
"And if Kerry's superiors had known the truth at
the time, they would never have recommended him for
the medal."
The book also claims to detail how Kerry personally
ordered the slaughter of small animals at a small hamlet
along the Song Bo De River.
MORE
The book, set for release next week, hit #1 on the AMAZON
http://tinyurl.com/5u3q8
hit parade after the DRUDGE REPORT revealed details
of the book -- a book the Kerry campaign believes is
the"the dirtiest of all dirty tricks ever played
on a candidate for the presidency."
The Kerry campaign is planning to vigorously counter
the charges and will accuse the veteran's groups of
being well-financed by a top Bush donor from Texas.
The vets have launched a blistering new TV commercial
questioning Kerry's honor and calling him a liar.
MORE
George Bates, an officer in Coastal Division 11, participated
in numerous operations with Kerry. In UNFIT FOR COMMAND,
Bates recalls a particular patrol with Kerry on the
Song Bo De River. He is still "haunted" by
the incident:
With Kerry in the lead, the boats approached a small
hamlet with three or four grass huts. Pigs and chickens
were milling around peacefully. As the boats drew closer,
the villagers fled. There were no political symbols
or flags in evidence in the tiny village. It was obvious
to Bates that existing policies, decency, and good sense
required the boats to simply move on.
Instead, Kerry beached his boat directly in the small
settlement. Upon his command, the numerous small animals
were slaughtered by heavy-caliber machine guns. Acting
more like a pirate than a naval officer, Kerry disembarked
and ran around with a Zippo lighter, burning up the
entire hamlet.
Bates has never forgotten Kerry's actions.
MORE
UNFIT FOR COMMAND, DRUDGE has learned, claims Kerry
"earned his Silver Star by killing a lone, fleeing,
teenage Viet Cong in a loincloth."
ARE THE VETS TELLING THE TRUTH?
"They hired a goddamn private investigator to dig
up trash!" charged a top Kerry adviser traveling
with the senator late Tuesday. "This is pay for
play... How low can they go?"
Kerry supporters are comparing the effort by the veterans
to the Arkansas State troopers tell-all against Bill
Clinton.
MORE
John O'Neill, co-author of UNFIT FOR COMMAND, believes
that "Kerry's Star would never have been awarded
had his actions been reviewed through normal channels.
In his case, he was awarded the medal two days after
the incident with no review. The medal was arranged
to boost the morale of Coastal Division 11, but it was
based on false and incomplete information provided by
Kerry himself."
According to Kerry's Silver Star citation, Kerry was
in command of a three-boat mission on the Dong Cung
River. As the boats approached the target area, they
came under intense enemy fire. Kerry ordered his boat
to attack and all boats opened fire. He then beached
directly in front of the enemy ambushers. In the battle
that followed, the crews captured enemy weapons. His
boat then moved further up the river to suppress more
enemy fire. A rocket exploded near Kerry's boat, and
he ordered to charge the enemy. Kerry beached his boat
10 feet from the rocket position and led a landing party
ashore to pursue the enemy.
Kerry' citation reads: "The extraordinary daring
and personal courage of Lt. Kerry in attacking a numerically
superior force in the face of intense fire were responsible
for the highly successful mission."
Here's what O'Neill and the Swiftees say: "According
to Kerry's crewman Michael Madeiros, Kerry had an agreement
with him to turn the boat in and onto the beach if fired
upon. Each of the three boats involved in the operation
was involved in the agreement." O'Neill writes
that one crewman even recalls a discussion of probable
medals.
Doug Reese, a pro Kerry Army veteran, recounted what
happened that day to O'Neill, "Far from being alone,
the boats were loaded with many soldiers commanded by
Reese and two other advisors. When fired at, Reese's
boat--not Kerry's--was the first to beach in the ambush
zone. Then Reese and other troops and advisors (not
Kerry) disembarked, killing a number of Viet Cong and
capturing a number of weapons. None of the participants
from Reese's boat received Silver Stars.
O'Neill continues: "Kerry's boat moved slightly
downstream and was struck by a rocket-propelled grenade.
. . .A young Viet Cong in a loincloth popped out of
a hole, clutching a grenade launcher, which may or may
not have been loaded. . . Tom Belodeau, a forward gunner,
shot the Viet Cong with an M-60 machine gun in the leg
as he fled. . . . Kerry and Medeiros (who had many troops
in their boat) took off, perhaps with others, and followed
the young Viet Cong and shot him in the back, behind
a lean to."
O'Neill concludes "Whether Kerry's dispatching
of a fleeing, wounded, armed or unarmed teenage enemy
was in accordance with the customs of war, it is very
clear that many Vietnam veterans and most Swiftees do
not consider this action to be the stuff of which medals
of any kind are awarded; nor would it even be a good
story if told in the cold details of reality. There
is no indication that Kerry ever reported that the Viet
Cong was wounded and fleeing when dispatched. Likewise,
the citation simply ignores the presence of the soldiers
and advisors who actually 'captured the enemy weapons'
and routed the Viet Cong. . . . [and] that Kerry attacked
a 'numerically superior force in the face of intense
fire' is simply false. There was little or no fire after
Kerry followed the plan. . . . The lone, wounded, fleeing
young Viet Cong in a loincloth was hardly a force superior
to the heavily armed Swift Boat and its crew and the
soldiers carried aboard."
DRUDGE learns from UNFIT FOR COMMAND that if Kerry's
superior officers knew the truth, they would never have
recommended the award:
"Admiral Roy Hoffmann, who sent a Bravo Zulu (meaning
"good work"), to Kerry upon learning of the
incident, was very surprised to discover in 2004 what
had actually occurred. Hoffmann had been told that Kerry
had spontaneously beached next to the bunker and almost
single-handedly routed a bunkered force in Viet Cong.
He was shocked to find out that Kerry had beached his
boat second in a preplanned operation, and that he had
killed a single, wounded teenage foe as he fled."
"Commander Geoge Elliott, who wrote up the initial
draft of Kerry's Silver Star citation, confirms that
neither he, nor anyone else in the Silver Star process
that he knows, realized before 1996 that Kerry was facing
a single, wounded young Viet Cong fleeing in a loincloth.
While Commander Elliott and many other Swiftees believe
that Kerry committed no crime in killing the fleeing,
wounded enemy (with a loaded or empty launcher), others
feel differently. Commander Elliott indicates that a
Silver Star recommendation would not have been made
by him had he been aware of the actual facts."
Developing....
As Editor-In-Chief
of The Journal of History I tried and tried to endorse
a Democrat for the 2004 election. First I endorsed Dennis
Kucinich until I learned that he wants UN troops in
Iraq. I pulled the endorsement because UN troops catagorically
mean New World Order.
Then, I went way out on a limb by endorsing Lyndon
LaRouche because he seemed to symbolize everything that
would help most people in the world until he made the
statement that Franklin D. Roosevelt did not know that
Japan would attack Pearl Harbor. Since I have learned
that FDR deliberately set about to cause Japan to attack
Pearl Harbor, I thought that Mr. La Rouche is either
stupid or in with the rest of the elites, so pulled
my endorsement of him.
There isn't a single other Democrat who is desirous
of carrying out what the mass of the American people
want as they are all elitists, every single one of them
including John Kerry who is in Skull and Bones as Bush
is, John Edwards, or any of the others.
So I returned to the only decent man in my opinion
who would try his hardest to achieve what is good for
the American people, and by extension the people of
the entire world, Ralph Nader, an honest man who may
have made some mistakes in his life, i.e. a possible
misdiagnosis of the Chevrolet Corvair, and endorse him
unequivocally. See below for more on Mr. Nader.
Nader criticizes US bias to Israel
Regional-USA, Politics, 6/19/2004
The Independent Candidate for the presidential American
elections Ralph Nader on Friday vehemently criticized
the American policies towards the Middle East and Washington's
full bias to Israel.
In a statement to Emirate al-Khalij newspaper, Nader called
upon Bush's administration to support efforts exerted
for achieving peace in the Middle East and to stop backing
the Israeli military system as well as to start thinking
of its citizens' interests.
He depicted the White House and the US congress as a puppet
theatre where Israeli officials control everything and
decide what they want then they return to Israel carrying
billions of dollars and arms.
Regarding the situation in Iraq, Nader pointed out that
the American forces control everything in Iraq including
oil and economy, asserting that Washington has planned
to establish 14 permanent military base to be the greatest
American base outside of the American borders.
